Dedication to all gods and honours for a Cyrenaean citizen
created: Transcription from stone (CDL).
source date: Second half of second century BC
language: ar; en; fr; de; grc; grc-Latn; el; he
availability: CC BY-NC-SA 4.0 Deed Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. All citation, reuse or distribution of this work must contain a link back to DOI: https://doi.org/10.60760/unibo/igcyrgvcyr2 and the filename (IGCyr000000 or GVCyr000), as well as the year of consultation. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/)

[...], pp. 151-152, n. 1, fig. 41, whence [...], 9.359; [...], pp. 418-419, whence [...], 38.1903; [...] 033900.

Cf. [...] 15090; [...], p. 34; [...], p. 363; [...], whence [...], 39.1718; [...] esp. p. 140, whence [...], 49.2504.

[...]νους Κυρηναῖον, συγγενῆ καὶ στρατηγὸν τῶν κατὰ Λιβύην τόπων Ἵππις Ἵππιος τῶν [...] θεοῖς πᾶσιν ἀνέθηκεν.

συγγενῆ καὶ στρατηγὸν[^a1]

[^a1: συγγενῆ καὶ στρατηγὸν | τὸν συγγενῆ καὶ στρατηγὸν | [...] στρατηγὸν]

Λιβύην τόπων[^a2]

[^a2: Λιβύην τόπων | Κυρήνην τόπων]

La statue d'un tel fils de [...]nès, cyrénéen, Parent du roi, général des zones de toute la Libye, a été consacrée à tous les dieux par Hippis fils d'Hippis, membre des [...].

The statue of so and so, son of [...]nes, a Cyrenaean, Akin to the king, general of the places throughout Libya, was dedicated to all the gods by Hippis son of Hippis, a member of the [...].

La statua del tale, figlio di [...]nes, cireneo, Parente del re, stratego dei luoghi di tutta la Libia, è stata dedicata a tutti gli dèi da Hippis figlio di Hippis, membro dei [...].

(تمثال) [فلان بن فلان] [---] نوس، كيريني (أي من كيريني)، [المُقرب منه (له من النفوذ والصلاحيات ما للملك)] (للملك) وجنرال (قائد) لل [أماكن في جميع أنحاء ليبيا]، كُرِس (أي التمثال) لجميع المؤلهين من قبل هيبوس بن هيبوس، عضو في ال[---].

The dimensions of the lost part may be inferred from l. 3, where Λιβύην seems probably better than Κυρήνην (see discussion by [...], pp. 418-419) and was later on confirmed through IGCyr080900.

At l. 2, the article would provide too long a restoration, whereas at l. 4 πρώτων φίλων, a title that would seem a good suggestion, is undoubtedly too long.

For the date, on basis of the lettering, Ghislanzoni proposed the end of the second or beginning of the first century BC. Moretti thought that it was rather the first half of the second BC. Eventually, the discussion of the aulic titles led Laronde to the second half of that century.