Epitaph
created: Transcription from stone (CDL).
source date: Third century BC
language: ar; en; fr; de; grc; grc-Latn; el; he
availability: CC BY-NC-SA 4.0 Deed Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. All citation, reuse or distribution of this work must contain a link back to DOI: https://doi.org/10.60760/unibo/igcyrgvcyr2 and the filename (IGCyr000000 or GVCyr000), as well as the year of consultation. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/)

[...], pp. 179-180, n. 55, fig. 37; [...], p. 113, n. 93, fig. 49, whence [...], 9.205; [...] 024900. Cf. [...], p. 204 (date of the base); [...], p. 138 (probable provenance); [...], catalogue B.64.

Ἐπιτέλης Λύσιος

Λύσιος[^a1]

[^a1: Λύσιος | Λυσίου]

Epitelès fils de Lysis.

Epiteles son of Lysis.

Epiteles figlio di Lysis.

Robinson had no information about the provenance. This seems to show that the base was found in situ by De Cou in 1911. As the Norton mission does not seem to have explored other parts of the necropoleis, the Thorns supposed that the provenance is the North Necropolis and it is probably so.