Dedication or private honours
created: Transcription from stone (CDL).
source date: Perhaps fourth century BC
language: ar; en; fr; de; grc; grc-Latn; el; he
availability: CC BY-NC-SA 4.0 Deed Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. All citation, reuse or distribution of this work must contain a link back to DOI: https://doi.org/10.60760/unibo/igcyrgvcyr2 and the filename (IGCyr000000 or GVCyr000), as well as the year of consultation. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/)

Not published before [...] 128700.

[...]ος [...]άτω ἀνέθηκε

[...]ος[^a1] [...]άτω[^a2] ἀνέθηκε[^a3]

[^a1: [...]ος | [...] [...]ος]

[^a2: [...]άτω | [...] [...]άτω]

[^a3: ἀνέθηκε | Ἀπόλλωνι ἀνέθηκε]

[...]os fils de [...]atos a consacré.

[^1] La statue d'Untel fils de [...] a été consacrée par Untel fils de [...]atos à Apollon.

[^1: ou]

[...]os son of [...]atos dedicated.

[^2] The statue ofSo-and-so son of [...] was dedicated by So-and-so son of [...]atos to Apollo.

[^2: or]

[...]os figlio di [...]atos ha dedicato.

[^3] La statua del tale figlio di [...] è stata dedicata dal tale figlio di [...]atos ad Apollo.

[^3: o]

Although the right edge is missing, there seems to be space after the letters legible at the end of ll. 1 and 2, so that the stone may have originally ended after the missing epsilon of line 3. If so, as the ending -ος may be either a nominative or a genitive, depending on the inflexion type, two possibilities remain: either a man's name at line 1 and his father's name at line 2, giving the minimal formula 'So-and-so son of So-and-so dedicated'. Alternatively, we would have at line 1 a name at the accusative with the related father's name, at line 2 another name at the nominative followed by the father's name and at l. 3 the name of the deity, presumably Apollo; it would be the dedication of an image of the first mentioned by the second mentioned person.