Dedication of an exedra as a tithe
created: Transcription from stones (CDL).
source date: Fourth to third centuries BC
language: ar; en; fr; de; grc; grc-Latn; el; he
availability: CC BY-NC-SA 4.0 Deed Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. All citation, reuse or distribution of this work must contain a link back to DOI: https://doi.org/10.60760/unibo/igcyrgvcyr2 and the filename (IGCyr000000 or GVCyr000), as well as the year of consultation. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/)

[...], n. 2, whence Blass, [...] 4839 (fragment A); [...], XI.48, XII.12, whence [...], 35, fig. 33 (fragment A); [...], XI.57, whence [...], 185 (fragment B, without illustration, with reference to fragment A); [...] 008900.

[...]ης Ἱππoκλεῦς Ἀγασικλῆς Φιλοκλεῦς Ἀπόλλωνι δεκάταν

Τιμα[...] Ἀγαμ[...]

[...]ης[^a1] Τιμα[...][^a2] Ἀγαμ [...][^a3]

[^a1: [...]ης | Τιμασικλῆς]

[^a2: Τιμα[...] | Τιμασικλῆς Ἱπποκλεῦς]

[^a3: Ἀγαμ [...] | Ἀγασικλῆς Φιλοκλεῦς]

A. Untel fils d'Hippoklès et Agasiklès fils de Philoklès ont consacré à Apollon comme dîme.

B. Tim[...] fils d'Aga[...].

A. So-and-so son of Hippokles and Agasikles son of Philokles dedicated to Apollo as a tithe.

B. Tim[...] son of Aga[...].

A. Il tale figlio di Hippokles e Agasikles figlio di Philokles hanno dedicato ad Apollo come decima.

B. Tim[...] figlio di Aga[...].

Pugliese Carratelli was right in attributing both blocks to the same exedra, but his restorations are not cautious enough.

At A.1 the space is not sufficient for the 8 letters he supposes.

B has not the whole formula of dedication, but probably bears on two lines the name and patronym of the person whose statue stood above. The 4th letter of the patronym is surely no Σ, but might be Μ, Ν or Κ, rather than I.