Accounts of the damiergoi
created: Transcription from editor.
source date: Probably between 350 and 335 BC (Rosamilia)
language: ar; en; fr; de; grc; grc-Latn; el; he
availability: CC BY-NC-SA 4.0 Deed Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. All citation, reuse or distribution of this work must contain a link back to DOI: https://doi.org/10.60760/unibo/igcyrgvcyr2 and the filename (IGCyr000000 or GVCyr000), as well as the year of consultation. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/)

[...], p. 90, n. 15 (ph.), whence [...], 9.16; [...] 011900; [...], pp.300-301, number 41, fragment a (text).

For a general bibliography on the accounts of the damiergoi see IGCyr011400.

[...] [...]νκαι [...] ἐξιὸν βουθυσιᾶν ἠσσᾶν [...] μναῖ [...] Χ Ζ > ⋮, λοιπὸν [...] [...] μναῖ[...] Χ 𐅠 𐅠 > >[...]. Παρόρεγμα δαμιεργοῖς μναῖ – – –

[...] Dépenses, sacrifices de bovins inclus: [...]mines [...] 21 drachmes 1 obole. Reste: [...]mines [...] 28 drachmes 4 oboles. Indemnité pour les démiurges 3 mines.

[...] Expenses, sacrifices of oxen included: [...]mines [...] 21 drachmas 1 obol. Remainder: [...]mines [...] 28 drachmas 4 obols. Allowance for the damiergoi 3 mines.

[...] Uscite, sacrifici dei buoi inclusi: [...]mine [...] 21 dracme 1 obolo. Resto: [...]mine [...] 28 dracme 4 oboli. Retribuzione per i damiurghi 3 mine.

[---] النفقات متضمنة الأضحيات من الثيران: [---] [ميناي] [---]و21 دراخما و1 أوبول. الباقي: [---] [ميناي] [---]و28 دراخما و4 أوبول. ويُعطى للداميرجوي [3 ميناي].

Oliverio provides a letter-height of 0.018, which seems too much; admitting that the stone's measures were right, we give our estimation for the letters.

A large part of this inscription is restored with help of the parallel formulation of the other accounts.

Additional commentary for [...]: [...] offers a tantalizing joint of this fragment with IGCyr013600. In favour of this view, he mentions a similar depth of the stones, approaching heights of the letters and a common use of a dotted omicron, this last point being not very clear at IGCyr013600. In fact, the preserved parts match well, adding to the present fragment the ends of its lines 3 to 5. Rosamilia mentions a possible difference in the shape of the glyph Ζ for 50 mines: this does not seem convincing, as in both fragments we find an oblique drawing of this character. Conversely, there is a noticeable difference between the shape of the glyph > (1 obol), which is here angular, whereas it has a lunate shape at IGCyr013600. For that reason, we do not follow Rosamilia in his reconstruction, the more so that the present fragment was never seen again after Oliverio's publication.