Unfinished epitaph
created: Transcription from stone (CDL).
source date: Second century BC
language: ar; en; fr; de; grc; grc-Latn; el; he
availability: CC BY-NC-SA 4.0 Deed Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. All citation, reuse or distribution of this work must contain a link back to DOI: https://doi.org/10.60760/unibo/igcyrgvcyr2 and the filename (IGCyr000000 or GVCyr000), as well as the year of consultation. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/)

[...], p. 114, n. 102, fig. 58, whence [...], 9.214; [...] 025800. Cf. [...], p. 205 (date of the base); [...], p. 137; [...], catalogue B.102.

Κληνάτα Διοσκo[...].

Διοσκουρίδου

Klenata fille de Diosko[...].

Klenata daughter of Diosko[...].

Klenata figlia di Diosko[...].

At line 2 Oliverio suspected a lacuna, but the line was certainly never finished. It is thus dubious that the base was found in a Necropolis, as said by Oliverio.

For the unfinished father's name there are different possibilities: Διόσκορος and at least three variants of Διοσκουρίδης with different linguistic features.

The Thorns suspected that the base comes from the North Necropolis because it is the only part that was explored by the Italian archaeologists before World War II.