Probably private honours and artist's signature
created: Transcription from previous editors.
source date: Late third to early second century BC
language: ar; en; fr; de; grc; grc-Latn; el; he
availability: CC BY-NC-SA 4.0 Deed Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. All citation, reuse or distribution of this work must contain a link back to DOI: https://doi.org/10.60760/unibo/igcyrgvcyr2 and the filename (IGCyr000000 or GVCyr000), as well as the year of consultation. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/)

[...], p. 43, n. 21, ph. 42 fig. 36 and pp. 4, 52, and [...], 1962.368, whence [...], 20.708; [...], n. 14, whence [...], 27.1125bis; [...] 064200. Cf. [...], n. 11, whence [...], 64.2012; [...], p. 105.

[...] [...]ρητος ἱεριτεύων Ἀπόλλωνος [...] Ἀριστομένους Ἀθηναῖος ἐποίησε

[...]ρητος[^a1]

[^a1: [...]ρητος | Κρητὸς | Xάρητος]

Ἀπόλλωνος[^a2]

[^a2: Ἀπόλλωνος | Ἀπόλλωνι]

[...] fils de[...]rès, étant prêtre d'Apollon a consacré ce monument.

Oeuvre de d'Untel, fils d'Aristoménès, athénien.

[...] son of [...]res, while being priest of Apollo dedicated this monument.

Made by So-and-so, son of Aristomenes, an Athenian.

[...] figlio di [...]res, quando era sacerdote di Apollo dedicò questo monumento.

Opera del tale, figlio di Aristomenes, ateniese.

Pugliese Carratelli edited this inscription from a photograph in the Cyrene archive with the help of a mention of the artist's signature made by Oliverio in a conference in 1938.

We follow Reynolds in relating the god's name to the office of priest with the genitive Ἀπόλλωνος, although this word-order is unusual. However, Pugliese Carratelli's idea of a dative is not impossible, the god's name being related to the understated verb of dedication and the priest being Apollo's one par excellence. The translation would then be 'being priest dedicated this monument to Apollo'. If the former is preferred, we would have private honours with only the identification of the person featured in the lost statue, without mention of the person responsible for the monument (for this type see for instance IGCyr022900).

There are at least two possibilites for the father's name of the dedicant, which we prefer not to restore. The preserved ending leads to a very short series of names attested in Cyrenaica. In fact, two names with a genitive ending -ρητος (a type that is not very usual) are known in Cyrenaica: on one hand we have Κρής which was Reynold's suggestion and has possibly two occurrences at Cyrene (IGCyr014700a.c.iii.35 and IGCyr112600, both from the end of the fifth century). On the other hand, we know of Χάρης, preferred by Rosamilia with ingenious arguments which do not seem all quite convincing to Dobias-Lalou (see at [...], p. 105).