Tithe
created: Transcription from previous editors (CDL).
source date: Probably first half of third century BC
language: ar; en; fr; de; grc; grc-Latn; el; he
availability: CC BY-NC-SA 4.0 Deed Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. All citation, reuse or distribution of this work must contain a link back to DOI: https://doi.org/10.60760/unibo/igcyrgvcyr2 and the filename (IGCyr000000 or GVCyr000), as well as the year of consultation. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/)

[...], p. 233, n. 1 (ph.), whence [...], 28.1541; [...], p. 394 (as unpublished), whence [...], 38.1870; [...] 071000.

Cf. [...], whence [...] 68.1746 [...], p. 87, footnote 22.

Εὐγένης Ἀρίμμαντος δεκάταν τῶι Ἀπόλλωνι

Εὐγένης [...]ντος[^a1]

[^a1: Εὐγένης [...]ντος | Εὔξενος Μ[...]ντος]

Eugenès fils d'Arimmas a consacré la dîme à Apollon.

Eugenes son of Arimmas dedicated the tithe to Apollo.

Eugenes figlio di Arimmas ha dedicato la decima ad Apollo.

The letters missing at l. 1 have been erased when the stone was re-used. For the father's name, to judge from the photograph, we agree with Reynolds for a loss of 6 letters, so that Ἀρίμμας seems a good restoration. As to the first name, it is not easy to decide between the two different readings proposed. We only may suspect that Reynolds could spend more time to study the inscription than Laronde and Chamoux on their brief visit in 1976.

Reynolds dated the lettering to «perhaps third to second century BC» and Rosamilia to the 'very time of Magas'. This would not quite discard Laronde's opinion, although he dated the lettering to the «fourth century» or somewhat later and thought subsequentely that the stone was probably earlier than the foundation of Berenike and that it would have been brought from Euesperides, re-used a first time in the city-defences of Berenike and later again in the Byzantine Church. The question cannot be answered with precision, as the abandonment of Euesperides and refoundation of Berenike followed exactly the end of Magas' reign. As we have so few inscriptions from Euesperides/Berenike, we are not able to date the lettering on a scale of ten years earlier or later.