Epitaph (?)
created: Transcription from previous editor (CDL).
source date: Possibly first half of fourth century BC
language: ar; en; fr; de; grc; grc-Latn; el; he
availability: CC BY-NC-SA 4.0 Deed Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. All citation, reuse or distribution of this work must contain a link back to DOI: https://doi.org/10.60760/unibo/igcyrgvcyr2 and the filename (IGCyr000000 or GVCyr000), as well as the year of consultation. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/)

[...], p. 68, and [...], 2007.562, whence [...], 56.2032, 1; [...] 093600. Cf. [...], p. 70; [...], p. 100.

Εὐμηλίδας ἱαρεύς [...].

Εὐμηλίδας[^a1] ἱαρεύς

[^a1: Εὐμηλίδας | Μηλιχίω]

Eumèlidas, prêtre.

Eumelidas, priest.

Eumelidas, sacerdote.

.[إف]ميلي[داس] الكاهن

The transcription and interpretation given by [...] are puzzling in many ways: a priest devoted to Melichios as such is not plausible and his own name would be missing in the inscription. Furthermore there is no hint in the illustration of the chi mentioned in the diplomatic transcription.

Either we have one more mention of the divine epithet Μηλίχιος, which cannot be plausibly completed by the mention of a priest. A possibility for the second word would be ἱαρόν, which differs with the last letters transcribed at line 2.

On the other hand the segment ΜΗΛΙ at that place may belong to a personal name, such as Εὐμηλίδας. This reading is the more tantalizing that a priest of Apollo named Eumelidas is known from IGCyr020900. The name of Apollo is often omitted in mentions of the eponymous priest. As there are some tombs in the area, a funerary mention would be quite plausible. This identification seems also plausible to [...], who dates the eponymous priest to c. 350 B.C.