Perhaps list of ephebes
created: Transcription from stone (CDL).
source date: End of second or beginning of first century BC
language: ar; en; fr; de; grc; grc-Latn; el; he
availability: CC BY-NC-SA 4.0 Deed Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. All citation, reuse or distribution of this work must contain a link back to DOI: https://doi.org/10.60760/unibo/igcyrgvcyr2 and the filename (IGCyr000000 or GVCyr000), as well as the year of consultation. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/)

[...], 15; [...] 094600. Cf. [...], p. 253; [...], p. 75.

[...] [...] Πράτιος [...]ς Ἀμμωνίω [...]ν Ὠρίωνος [...]ν Ὠρίωνος [...]ος Πτολεμαίω [...]ος Θευχήστω [...]ν Θευ[...] [...]ος Πο[...] [...]

Πράτιος[^a1] Πτολεμαίω[^a2] Θευχήστω[^a3] ος Πο[...][^a4]

[^a1: Πράτιος | Πρατ[...]]

[^a2: Πτολεμαίω | Πτολεμαίω]

[^a3: Θευχήστω | Θευδώρω]

[^a4: ος Πο[...] | ν Π[...]]

[...], Un tel fils de Pratis, [...]s fils d'Ammônios, [...]n fils d'Oriôn, (5) [...]n fils d'Oriôn, [...]os fils de Ptolémaios, [...]os fils de Theukhrestos, [...]n fils d'Untel, [...]os fils de Po[...], [...].

[...], So-and-so son of Pratis, [...]s son of Ammonios, [...]n son of Orion, (5) [...]n son of Orion, [...]os son of Ptolemaios, [...]os son of Theuchrestos, [...]n son of So-and-so, [...]os son of Po[...], [...].

[...], il tale figlio di Pratis, [...]s figlio di Ammonios, [...]n figlio di Orion, (5) [...]n figlio di, [...]os figlio di Ptolemaios, [...]os figlio di Theuchrestos, [...]n figlio del tale, [...]os figlio di Po[...], [...].

In this list of names (of which only the end survives) each followed by the father's name (of which only the beginning survives), the first letters of all father's names are carefully aligned, so that they are visualized as two columns. Given the surviving width, is is very plausible that another similar list was cut besides, either to the left or to the right, forming two columns on the stone with the same layout as at IGCyr015200.

This list is very much alike IGCyr103800, the support of which is thicker. As the present stone seems to have been recut, it is impossible to push the hypothesis forward. At least, both inscriptions seem to come from the same workshop.

Pugliese Carratelli, who published this stone from Oliverio's papers, thought that IGCyr094700 might belong to the same stone. C. Dobias-Lalou does not agree and thinks that the scripts are different and the latter inscription earlier.

This list might belong to the group of dedications by ephebes, as cautiously suggested by [...].