Perhaps a list of ephebes
created: Transcription from stone (CDL).
source date: End of second or beginning of first century BC
language: ar; en; fr; de; grc; grc-Latn; el; he
availability: CC BY-NC-SA 4.0 Deed Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. All citation, reuse or distribution of this work must contain a link back to DOI: https://doi.org/10.60760/unibo/igcyrgvcyr2 and the filename (IGCyr000000 or GVCyr000), as well as the year of consultation. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/)

[...] XI.7, whence [...], 19 (no image); [...], pp. 216-218 (photo), whence [...], 53.2047; [...] 095100. Cf. [...], p. 254 (ph.); [...], p. 75.

[...] [...]ιαν[...] [...] Ἐπικ[...] [...] Πραξι[...] [...] Καλλίππου [...] λου [...] Ποσειδ[...]

[...]ιαν[...][^a1] Ἐπικ[...][^a2] Πραξι[...][^a3] Καλλίππου[^a4] [...]λου[^a5] Ποσειδ[...][^a6]

[^a1: [...]ιαν[...] | Ἀν[...]]

[^a2: Ἐπικ[...] | Ἐπικυ[...] | Ἐπικύδης]

[^a3: Πραξι[...] | Πραξ[...]]

[^a4: Καλλίππου | Κάλλιππος]

[^a5: [...]λου | Ξοῦθος]

[^a6: Ποσειδ[...] | Ποσειδ[...]]

[^1]

[^1: Liste de bribes de noms au génitif, intraduisible]

[^2]

[^2: A list of parts of names at the genitive case, not usefully translatable]

[^3]

[^3: Una lista di parti di nomi al genitivo, intraducibile]

The script is very similar to that of IRCyr2020 C.294, although both fragments do not match together. Therefore, this one should be one of the latest inscriptions presumably dating of the Hellenistic period and it might explain the use of koine at least in some names.

Both for reasons of layout and because at l. 5 there is a gap after the upsilon, it is impossible to admit with Oliverio that the preserved names were at the nominative case. They should be at the genitive as fathers' names.

According to [...], p. 254, this might be a list of ephebes, but too fragmentary to allow any confidence.