Fragment of an official document
created: Transcription from previous editor.
source date: Second half of second century BC, probably between 139 and 132 BC (Rosamilia, se
language: ar; en; fr; de; grc; grc-Latn; el; he
availability: CC BY-NC-SA 4.0 Deed Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. All citation, reuse or distribution of this work must contain a link back to DOI: https://doi.org/10.60760/unibo/igcyrgvcyr2 and the filename (IGCyr000000 or GVCyr000), as well as the year of consultation. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/)

[...], 106 (ph.); [...] 097150 [...], pp. 420-423, number 4, document III, lines 19-24 (text).

[...] [...]ος ἐπισ [...]ήιας τῶν ἀγρῶν [...]αθέντας ἐπὶ [...] [...] τὸς ἀγρὸς ἐπὶ τοῖς [...] ἐγδόσιος ἱαρη [...]τήιαν καὶ ανε [...]

ἐπισ[...][^a1] ήιας τῶν ἀγρῶν[^a2] τὸς ἀγρὸς ἐπὶ τοῖς[^a3] ἐγδόσιος ἱαρη[^a4] τήιαν καὶ ανε[^a5]

[^a1: ἐπισ[...] | ἐπὶ σ[...] [...]]

[^a2: ήιας τῶν ἀγρῶν | νιας τῶν ἀγρῶν[...] | μιας τῶν ἀγρῶν]

[^a3: τὸς ἀγρὸς ἐπὶ τοῖς | τὸς ἀγρὸς ἐπὶ τοῖς [...] | ἀγρὸς ἐπὶ τοῖς]

[^a4: ἐγδόσιος ἱαρη | ἐγδόσιος ἱαρῆ | ἐγδόσιος ἱαρη[...]]

[^a5: τήιαν καὶ ανε | τη[...][...][...] καὶ ανε | τηι[...]η καὶ αν[...] | τη[...][...][...] καὶ αν[...]]

Intraduisible (cf. commentaire).

Not usefully translatable (see commentary).

Intraducibile (cf. commento).

لا يمكن ترجمته بشكل جيد.

This fragment is only known from a photograph in the Cyrene archives. From the lettering and textual content, we might guess that it is a part of IGCyr062810, but this cannot be pushed because we have no information about dimensions either of the stone or of the letters. [...] hesitantly prints this text below IGCyr062810, separated from it by an unknown number of lost lines.

Pugliese Carratelli thought the fragment to be complete at right. For [...], we thought that this point was not clear and admitted possible gaps at end-lines. Following [...], we now give up this possibility. This allows to identify the word 'priest' at the end of line 5.

The word ἀγρός 'field' is mentionned twice (l. 2 and 4) in this small fragment along with ἔκδοσις 'sale' (l. 5). Because of the word 'priest' (ἱαρεύς at l. 5 (not necessarily at the accusative singular as Rosamilia suggests, the accusative or genitive pural being also possible). The whole might deal with some sacred land like at IGCyr062810.