Dedication
created: Transcription from stone (CDL).
source date: Perhaps about 200 BC (Rosamilia)
language: ar; en; fr; de; grc; grc-Latn; el; he
availability: CC BY-NC-SA 4.0 Deed Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. All citation, reuse or distribution of this work must contain a link back to DOI: https://doi.org/10.60760/unibo/igcyrgvcyr2 and the filename (IGCyr000000 or GVCyr000), as well as the year of consultation. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/)

[...], XIV.9, whence [...], 130 (no image); [...] 098300 [...], p. 106 and footnotes 109, 110.

[...]ντω[...] [...] ἱαριτεύσας ἀνέθηκε.

[...]ντω[...][^a1] ἱαριτεύσας ἀνέθηκε[^a2]

[^a1: [...]ντω[...] | [...]ν Τ[...] | [...]ντω[...]]

[^a2: ἱαριτεύσας ἀνέθηκε | ἱαριτεύσας [...]]

[...]ntô[...] fils d'Un tel a consacré ce monument après sa prêtrise.

[...]nto[...] son of So-and-so dedicated this monument after having been priest.

[...]nto[...] figlio d'Un taleha dedicato questo monumento dopo il suo sacerdozio.

Pugliese Carratelli at [...], published the inscription, which he did not find, from a drawing (not given) in Oliverio's papers. From the number of Oliverio's notebook we infer the date of 1928 for the find, which should have been fortuitous, as systematic excavations on the Agora began only in 1929. Although the findspot was not mentioned in [...], it is obvious that the stone was not moved from the area where it lies nowadays with the usual appearance of stones left outside for a long time.

Rosamilia was able to check Oliverio's reading at line 1 against Dobias-Lalou's reading. Further on, Rosamilia looked for a name containing the three letters. The mentioned Φρώντων, being a Latin name (Fronto) is impossible in Hellenistic Cyrenaica. Amongst the three other Greek names mentioned by Rosamilia, the most plausible would be Ἀμύντωρ, related with Ἀμύντας, which was used in Cyrenaica.