Dedication on occasion of a telesphoria
created: Transcription from stone (CDL).
source date: End of fourth or beginning of third century BC
language: ar; en; fr; de; grc; grc-Latn; el; he
availability: CC BY-NC-SA 4.0 Deed Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. All citation, reuse or distribution of this work must contain a link back to DOI: https://doi.org/10.60760/unibo/igcyrgvcyr2 and the filename (IGCyr000000 or GVCyr000), as well as the year of consultation. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/)

[...], 144 (no image); [...] 099200.

Cf. [...], pp. 196-197 (typology).

[...] [...]

[...] [...]

[...] [...]

[...][...]ρος [...]κράτευς

Βαῖος Λυσανία

Γ[...] Θ[...]

τελεσφορέντες [...]

[...]κράτευς[^a1]

[^a1: [...]κράτευς | [...]άτευς]

Untel fils d'Untel, Untel fils d'Untel, Untel fils d'Untel, [...]ros fils de [...]kratès, Baios fils de Lysanias, Untel fils de Th[...], à l'occasion de la telesphoria [...].

So-and-so son of So-and-so, So-and-so son of So-and-so, So-and-so son of So-and-so, [...]ros son of [...]krates, Baios son of Lysanias, So-and-so son of Th[...], while celebrating the telesphoria [...].

Il tale figlio del tale, il tale figlio del tale, il tale figlio del tale, [...]ros figlio di [...]krates, Baios figlio di Lysanias, il tale figlio di Th[...], in occasione della telesphoria [...].

From the layout of letters at line 3, we are able to deduce the dimensions of the missing parts; hence three columns mentioning three other men are lost at left; as for the following line, the formula might be more or less complete. Pugliese Carratelli thought that the stone was complete below and mentioned it as a base. C. Dobias-Lalou for [...] was not convinced, because the proeminent moulding and also because a base would also have a moulding below. [...] suggests that it might be the lintel of a naiskos, which seems a good idea.