Private honours
created: Transcription from stone (CDL).
source date: 150 to 120 BC
language: ar; en; fr; de; grc; grc-Latn; el; he
availability: CC BY-NC-SA 4.0 Deed Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. All citation, reuse or distribution of this work must contain a link back to DOI: https://doi.org/10.60760/unibo/igcyrgvcyr2 and the filename (IGCyr000000 or GVCyr000), as well as the year of consultation. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/)

[...], 182 (no image), and [...], p. 420 (ph.), whence [...], 38.1884; [...] 101600. Cf. [...], n. 0413.

Κράτητα Κράτητος Κράτης Φιλoξένου τῶν πρώτων φίλων τὸν αὑτοῦ υἱὸν ἀνέθηκε

Statue de Kratès fils de Kratès, son propre fils, consacrée par Kratès fils de Philoxénos, des Premiers Amis.

Statue of Krates son of Krates, his own son, dedicated by Krates son of Philoxenos, one of the First Friends.

Statua di Krates figlio di Krates, il suo proprio figlio, dedicata da Krates figlio di Philoxenos, dei Primi Amici.

(تمثال) كراتيس بن كراتيس، ابْنُهُ هو، كُرِس (التمثال) من قبل كراتيس بن فيلوكسينوس، أحد الأصدقاء الأوائل (أحد أعضاء هذه المجموعة).

Laronde ([...], p. 420) observed that the stone was broken off at right, a fact that Pugliese Carratelli for [...], 182 had not mentioned. Actually, at left the space before the first letters of lines 1 to 4 is 0.03, whereas at right the space is irregular, its least measure being at l. 2 of 0.10 and, moreover, the right side was not smoothened and thus not intended for being visible. Either another block was adjacent at right or the original larger block has been re-cut. It might thus be quite plausible that at least another text stood in a second column to the right, as happens on other bases bearing multipe statues. However, the two taus mentioned by Laronde as initial letters of lines of this lost right column and visible on the photo near the break are not at all aligned with the preserved ones, but stay at levels between viz. l. 1 and 2 and 3 and 4. We suggest that they were scratched later on. What may have been inscribed in the lost part remains wholly unknown.