Tithe for Apollo
created: Transcription from stone, Pernier's archive and Morelli's partial edition (CDL).
source date: First half of the fourth century BC
language: ar; en; fr; de; grc; grc-Latn; el; he
availability: CC BY-NC-SA 4.0 Deed Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. All citation, reuse or distribution of this work must contain a link back to DOI: https://doi.org/10.60760/unibo/igcyrgvcyr2 and the filename (IGCyr000000 or GVCyr000), as well as the year of consultation. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/)

Fragment b only: Morelli in [...], 251 (no image), whence [...] 104500; enhanced in this second edition (see commentary).

Κυδιλέα ⋮ Θευτίμω ἁ τῶ Παιᾶνος ⋮ Ἀπόλλωνι δεκάταν ⋮ ἀνέθηκε

Κυδιλέα ⋮ Θευτίμω[^a1]

[^a1: Κυδιλέα ⋮ Θευτίμω | [...]Τιμώ[...]ς | ὁ δεῖνα Τιμώνακτος | ὁ δεῖνα Τίμωνος ἱερεὺς [or] [or]]

Kudilea fille de Theutimos, épouse de Péan, a consacré à Apollon au titre de la dîme.

Kydilea daughter of Theutimos wife of Paean dedicated to Apollo as a tithe.

Kydilea figlia di Theutimos sposa di Peana ha dedicato ad Apollo come decima.

In the first edition of [...] we published fragment b, known only from Morelli's transcription without illustration. Having seen the main part of the base in 1976, Dobias-Lalou did not succeed in finding it again during later visits to the Museum. In 2001, she met at Cyrene Enzo Catani, who was looking for unpublished stones mentioned in Pernier's notebooks of years 1925 to 1936. When seeing Pernier's copy, Dobias-Lalou was able to identify the stone, which she had once seen already broken off at right. However, she did not notice at the time that the fragment published by Morelli was the missing part of the same stone. Thanks to kind permission given by Catani, we are now able to reassemble the base in its former condition.

The general outline of the text is very clear and in alignement with numerous other dedications of a tithe for Apollo. The father's name of the dedicant is well attested with the dialectal form Θεύτιμος, whereas the daughter's name Κυδιλέα has here the Attic ending, against dialectal -λᾶ, which will be again fashionable in the Roman imperial period (see [...], p. 43). The formula ἁ τῶ Παιᾶνος is surprising and somewhat ambiguous. If Paian was her husband, it would be more usually expressed with γυνά. Another possibility might be that she was born daughter of Paian and later adopted by Theutimos. Such instances are not rare at Cyrene for men in Roman times. However, the formulation is always very clear: X son of Y 'and by birth (φύσει δέ' of Z. The former interpretation seems preferable.

The name Παιάν is a rare instance of a divine name given to a human being. Although not very usual, this happens, especially for divine epithets or secondary figures of main gods. Such was Paian in relation with Apollo. Especially in this inscription, the use of a tripunct at line 2 was perhaps intended as a clear separation of the human Paian from the divine Apollo.