Names
created: Transcription from stone (CDL).
source date: Perhaps third century BC
language: ar; en; fr; de; grc; grc-Latn; el; he
availability: CC BY-NC-SA 4.0 Deed Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. All citation, reuse or distribution of this work must contain a link back to DOI: https://doi.org/10.60760/unibo/igcyrgvcyr2 and the filename (IGCyr000000 or GVCyr000), as well as the year of consultation. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/)

Not published before [...] 127000.

[...] [...]οι [...] [...] υ [...] [...] α [...] [...]

[...] Τέλων [...] Καλλισθένης[...] [...]σαρχος [...] [...]κράτης [...] [...]δας [...] [...]

a) Intraduisible.

b) Télôn [...], Kallisthénès [...], [...]sarkhos [...], [...]kratès [...], [...]das [...].

a) Not usefully translatable.

b) Telon [...], Kallisthenes [...], [...]sarchos [...], [...]krates [...], [...]das [...].

a) Intraducibile.

b) Telon [...], Kallisthenes [...], [...]sarchos [...], [...]krates [...], [...]das [...].

غير قابل للترجمة بشكل جيد

Fragment a seems to belong to the same inscription, but its reading is desperate. Fragment b, keeping part of the left edge, allows different observations. The lines began with personal names, amongst which one at line 4 was at the nominative. We choose to restore each of them at the same case, assuming that they were followed by fathers' names, which are wholly lost, at each line. However, if the face was originally straight, there was also the possibility that lines 1, 3 and 5 had the individual names at the nominative and lines 2, 4 the fathers' names at the genitive. Along the break there are faint traces of letters, helping to decide that the name at line 1 was Τέλων rather than a name in Τελεσ- and that at line 2 we have the compound Καλλισθένης rather than a short name Κάλλις.

At line 3, the space available would allow to restore one of two very common names, either Ἁγήσαρχος or Μνάσαρχος. The question should remain open.