Dedication, perhaps of public honours (?)
created: Transcription from stone (CDL).
source date: Perhaps end of second or beginning of first century BC
language: ar; en; fr; de; grc; grc-Latn; el; he
availability: CC BY-NC-SA 4.0 Deed Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. All citation, reuse or distribution of this work must contain a link back to DOI: https://doi.org/10.60760/unibo/igcyrgvcyr2 and the filename (IGCyr000000 or GVCyr000), as well as the year of consultation. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/)

Not published before [...] 128300.

απολ[...] Δαματρι [...][...] ἀνέθηκε [...] [...]

απολ[^a1]

[^a1: απολ | ἁ πόλις | Ἀπόλλωνι | Ἀπολλώνιος | Ἀπολλόδωρος]

Intraduisible (voir le commentaire).

Not usefully translatable (see commentary).

Intraducibile (vedi commento).

This fragment raises many questions. That the main aim of the inscription is a dedication is shown by the verb at line 3. Demeter should not be the deity to whom the dedication was made because her larger sanctuary, the extra-mural one, had not been investigated between 1915 (Ghislanzoni published two inscriptions) and the period 1969-1978 (American excavations, the finds of which were published by [...]). Anyhow those finds would not have been kept in the main epigraphical collection of the Cyrene Museum. As to the small urban sanctuary of Demeter, situated on the agora, it has been excavated by the Italian missions (Stucchi, Bacchielli) from 1957 on and its finds are also kept in other storerooms. It is thus highly plausible that we have at line 2 a form of the personal name Damatrios.

At line 1, three main readings may be explored, as given in the apparatus. 1) If we read ἁ πόλις, the dedication (sc. of a statue of Damatrios) would be made by 'the city'. This word-order is known elsewhere, but hitherto unattested in Cyrenaica. 2) If we read the name of Apollo, it should stand at the dative case as receiving the offering from Damatrios, but the place of the god's name at the beginning would be very unusual. 3) A third possibility would be a personal name referring to Apollo (Apollonios vel sim): the relation between the two personal names should then remain unclear, for we do not know how much of the stone is lost.