Unclear
created: Transcription from stone (CDL).
source date: Probably second century BC
language: ar; en; fr; de; grc; grc-Latn; el; he
availability: CC BY-NC-SA 4.0 Deed Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. All citation, reuse or distribution of this work must contain a link back to DOI: https://doi.org/10.60760/unibo/igcyrgvcyr2 and the filename (IGCyr000000 or GVCyr000), as well as the year of consultation. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/)

Not published before [...] 128800.

[...]ιμητ[...] [...]όνικον [...]ακόσια [...]νη αὐτοῦ [...]πολλ [...]

ιμητ[^a1] [...]νη[^a2] πολλ[^a3]

[^a1: ιμητ | Δημητρίου]

[^a2: [...]νη | συγγενῆ]

[^a3: πολλ | Ἀπόλλωνι | Ἀπολλωνίου]

Intraduisible (voir commentaire).

Not usefully translatable (see commentary).

Intraducibile (vedi commento).

غير قابل للترجمة بشكل جيد

Another fragment in the Cyrene Museum also bears inventory number 355: IGCyr062100. They obviously do not belong together.

This fragment, cut with a nice monumental lettering, should belong to a monument of some prestige. Its koine features shows that it is in some way related to the Ptolemaic power. But many points are ambiguous. The most obvious word, at line 3, is a number of hundreds, but it may be restored from 200 to 900. It should apply to a neutral plural at the accusative, which would be missing before it. A faint parallel might be offered by the dedication of 80 strigils (IGCyr100700).

At line 2 we probably have one of the many personal names in -νικος; however it would be a tantalizing guess to read ὀλυμπιόνικος or another such adjective. If the latter, it whould be necessary to have a personal name at line 5, being the subject of the implicit verb 'dedicated', while the honoured person would have its name and father's name at line 1. If the former, the mention of Apollo at line 5 would become plausible.

At line 4 the restoration of the word συγγενής, an aulic epithet at the Lagid court, is also a tantalizing guess which cannot be pushed ahead.