Honours and dedication
created: Transcription from stone (CDL).
source date: Perhaps second half of third century
language: ar; en; fr; de; grc; grc-Latn; el; he
availability: CC BY-NC-SA 4.0 Deed Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. All citation, reuse or distribution of this work must contain a link back to DOI: https://doi.org/10.60760/unibo/igcyrgvcyr2 and the filename (IGCyr000000 or GVCyr000), as well as the year of consultation. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/)

Not published before [...] 130300; [...], p. 105 and p. 113 footnote 101.

[...] [...]

[...]λης [...]λω

[...] [...]

[...] ς ἱαριτεύων ἀνέθηκε

[...]λης[^a1]

[^a1: [...]λης | [...]λης [...]]

[...]λω[^a2]

[^a2: [...]λω | Ἀπόλλωνι]

[...]ς ἱαριτεύων ἀνέθηκε[^a3]

[^a3: [...]ς ἱαριτεύων ἀνέθηκε | [...]ς ἱαριτεύων]

Untel fils d'Untel, [...]les son of [...]los, So-and-so son of So-and-so.

Untel fils d'Untel pendant sa prêtrise a consacré ce monument.

So-and-so son of So-and-so, [...]lès fils de [...]los, Untel fils d'Untel.

So-and-so son of So-and-so while being priest dedicated this monument.

Un tale figlio d'Un tale, [...]les figlio di [...]los, Un tale figlio d'Un tale.

Un tale figlio d'Un tale quando era sacerdote ha dedicato questo monumento.

The reading of this inscription has been considerably changed for this second edition, following [...]. His observation of a larger space between ll. 2 and 3 prompts to divide the inscription into two parts: three onomastic formulas displayed on three columns of two lines would have been the captions of statues or other images standing above, only part of the central one being preserved. Line 3 would have extended on the whole width of the monument and provided the usual formula of dedication with the name and father's name of the priest lost at left and the verb of dedication lost at right.

Personal names ending with -λης might be compounds in -κλῆς, -θάλης or -τέλης. A father's name ending with -λος was plausibly a compound name in -βωλος.