Dedication by a Ptolemaic officer
created: Transcription from photograph (CDL).
source date: Between 156 and 145 BC
language: ar; en; fr; de; grc; grc-Latn; el; he
availability: CC BY-NC-SA 4.0 Deed Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. All citation, reuse or distribution of this work must contain a link back to DOI: https://doi.org/10.60760/unibo/igcyrgvcyr2 and the filename (IGCyr000000 or GVCyr000), as well as the year of consultation. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/)

Not published before [...] 132600.

Ὑπὲρ βασιλέως Πτολεμαίου θεοῦ Εὐεργέτου [...] τῶν ἀρχισωματοφυλάκων [...] ἀνέθηκεν καὶ [...]

[...] Au nom du roi Ptolémée Dieux Evergète, Un tel, du corps des gardes du corps, a consacré [...] et [...].

[...] On behalf of king Ptolemy God Euergetes, So-and-so, of the body-guards, dedicated [...] and [...].

[...] Per il re Tolemeo Dio Evergete, il tale, delle guardie del corpo, ha dedicato [...] e [...].

Although alphas with dropped bar are common in the Roman period, there has been a taste for this drawing during the second half of the second century BC in inscriptions related with Ptolemaic authorities, namely IGCyr015300, IGCyr063400, IGCyr063700 and IGCyr101600, all dating from the reign of Ptolemy VIII Euergetes II. Conversely the square loop of rho is not so common.

This oddity of lettering helps to decide that the Ptolemy mentioned at line 1 can only be the second Euergetes, here mentioned for himself and not as the father of Ptolemy IX Soter II. The genitive implies the preposition ὑπέρ and consequently the high probability that no line preceded our line 1, a fact that the damaged condition of the stone would not allow to decide.

In the lacuna at the beginning of line 2, the man with the aulic title ton archisomatophylakon should have been mentioned with name and father's name, followed either by another title or by a word at the accusative mentioning the monument dedicated (which might also remain subaudible).

Moreover, Lucia Criscuolo (per epistulam) kindly adds two arguments helping to tighten the chronology between 156 and ca. 145: 1) this aulic title, attested for the first time in Egypt in 156/5, lasted for about one century; 2) from 145 on, in dedications with the formula ὑπέρ, the name of Ptolemy VIII is always followed by that of one or two queen(s), a mention for which there is no space here.

After καί another verb is expected, such as ἀφιέρωσεν, yet attested up to now only in dedications of the imperial period. Alternatively, another word at the accusative is also possible, see IGCyr092000.