Perhaps list of ephebes
created: Transcription from stone (CDL).
source date: Perhaps end of second or beginning of first century BC
language: ar; en; fr; de; grc; grc-Latn; el; he
availability: CC BY-NC-SA 4.0 Deed Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. All citation, reuse or distribution of this work must contain a link back to DOI: https://doi.org/10.60760/unibo/igcyrgvcyr2 and the filename (IGCyr000000 or GVCyr000), as well as the year of consultation. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/)

Never published before this edition.

[...] [...] [...]μω [...] [...]τα [...] [...]ω [...] [...]

[...] Νικο[...] [...] Καρ[...] [...] Φιλ[...] [...] Ἀσ[...] [...] [...]

a) Un tel fils de [...]mos, Un tel fils de [...]tas, Un tel fils de [...]os, [...].

b) Niko[...] fils de [...], Kar[...] fils de [...], Phil[...] fils de [...], As[...] fils de [...].

a) So and so son of [...]mos, So and so son of [...]tas, So and so son of [...]os, [...].

b) Niko[...] son of [...], Kar[...] son of [...], Phil[...] son of [...], As[...] son of [...].

a) Il tale figlio di [...]mos, Il tale figlio di [...]tas, Il tale figlio di [...]os, [...].

b) Niko[...] figlio di [...], Kar[...] figlio di [...], Phil[...] figlio di [...], As[...] figlio di [...].

The display and lettering allow to ascribe this fragment to a series of contemporary lists of ephebs, most of them being fragmentary. However, the depth of this stone proves that it had a support different from the others and cannot belong to any of them. With the display in two columns, we may be sure that the names are those of the ephebs themselves and not those of their officers.

The bits of personal names still preserved belong to the common stock of the local onomastics.