List of names
created: Transcription from stone (ER).
source date: Probably end of fourth or beginning of third century BC, according to Rosamilia
language: ar; en; fr; de; grc; grc-Latn; el; he
availability: CC BY-NC-SA 4.0 Deed Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. All citation, reuse or distribution of this work must contain a link back to DOI: https://doi.org/10.60760/unibo/igcyrgvcyr2 and the filename (IGCyr000000 or GVCyr000), as well as the year of consultation. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/)

Bibliography

Never published before this edition.

[...] [...] [...]άτω[...] [...] Φιλίσκω [...] [...]σίππω [...] [...]στράτω [...] [...]τέλευς [...] [...]στράτω [...][...][...] [...]

[...] Untel fils de [...]stratos (ou de Stratôn), Untel fils de Philiskos, Untel fils de [...]ippos, Untel fils de [...]stratos, (5) Untel fils de [...]telès, Untel fils de [...]stratos, [...].

[...] So-and-so son of [...]stratos (or of Straton), So-and-so son of Philiskos, So-and-so son of [...]ippos, So-and-so son of [...]stratos, (5) So-and-so son of [...]teles, So-and-so son of [...]stratos, [...].

[...] Il tale figlio di [...]stratos (o di Straton), Il tale figlio di Philiskos, Il tale figlio di [...]ippos, Il tale figlio di [...]stratos, (5) Il tale figlio di [...]teles, Il tale figlio di [...]stratos, [...].

Commentary

In spite of the fragmentary condition of this inscription, it is clear that it contained a list of names. As shown by the omega at line 1 and by the correspondance with second parts of compound names such as -τέλης at line 5, we may conclude that we have only part of the fathers' names. All names were carefully cut by the same hand. The lettering seems too old for a list of ephebes, the oldest one being IGCyr015200 at the beginning of the second century BC. It looks rather like the lists of military officers, which, however, are rather older. Other lists of names of unknown purpose, such as IGCyr009100 or IGCyr131500, are nearer in matter of lettering, although none may be brought together with this fragment.

The segment preserved at line 1 might be the end of a compound name in -στρατος or belong to the name Στράτων. At line 3, on the broken edge at left, a very small stroke above might belong to a sigma or a tau. This would lead, amongst the names that are common at Cyrene, either to Λύσιππος or to Ἀρίστιππος. Anyway, as none of the partial names preserved here is a rare one, no prosopographical identification is possible.