EpiDoc XML:
IGCyr0946002
Trismegistos ID:
738454
Source description
Support: Three fragments pasted together of a white marble panel broken all around and probably recut at back (w: 0.17 × h: 0.155 × d: 0.015 at left to 0.03 at right).
Layout: Inscribed on front face.
Letters: 0.01 to 0.013; varying intervals following number of letters in one name; well marked serifs; pi with wide upper bar, rho with small loop, sigma with parallel outer bars.
Date: End of second or beginning of first century BC
Findspot: Found before 1938 at Cyrene ➚: exact findspot unrecorded.
Place of origin: Findspot.
Last recorded location: Cyrene Museum, 309. Seen by Pugliese Carratelli in 1960 in Shahat: Cyrene Museum. Seen by C. Dobias-Lalou in 1977 in the same museum.
Text constituted from: Transcription from stone (CDL).
Bibliography
SECir, 15; IGCyr 094600 ➚. Cf. Dobias-Lalou 2016, p. 253; Rosamilia 2023, p. 75.
Text
Apparatus
French translation
[---], [Un tel] fils de Pratis, [---]s fils d'Ammônios, [---]n fils d'Oriôn, (5) [---]n fils d'Oriôn, [---]os fils de Ptolémaios, [---]os fils de Theukhrestos, [---]n [fils d'Untel], [---]os fils de Po[---], [---].
English translation
[---], [So-and-so] son of Pratis, [---]s son of Ammonios, [---]n son of Orion, (5) [---]n son of Orion, [---]os son of Ptolemaios, [---]os son of Theuchrestos, [---]n [son of So-and-so], [---]os son of Po[---], [---].
Italian translation
[---], [il tale] figlio di Pratis, [---]s figlio di Ammonios, [---]n figlio di Orion, (5) [---]n figlio di, [---]os figlio di Ptolemaios, [---]os figlio di Theuchrestos, [---]n [figlio del tale], [---]os figlio di Po[---], [---].
Commentary
In this list of names (of which only the end survives) each followed by the father's name (of which only the beginning survives), the first letters of all father's names are carefully aligned, so that they are visualized as two columns. Given the surviving width, is is very plausible that another similar list was cut besides, either to the left or to the right, forming two columns on the stone with the same layout as at IGCyr0152002.
This list is very much alike IGCyr1038002, the support of which is thicker. As the present stone seems to have been recut, it is impossible to push the hypothesis forward. At least, both inscriptions seem to come from the same workshop.
Pugliese Carratelli, who published this stone from Oliverio's papers, thought that IGCyr0947002 might belong to the same stone. C. Dobias-Lalou does not agree and thinks that the scripts are different and the latter inscription earlier.
This list might belong to the group of dedications by ephebes, as cautiously suggested by Dobias-Lalou 2016.
CC BY-NC-SA 4.0 Deed Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
All citation, reuse or distribution of this work must contain a link back to DOI: https://doi.org/10.60760/unibo/igcyrgvcyr2 and the filename (IGCyr000000 or GVCyr000), as well as the year of consultation.